228 thoughts on “Herbert George Ponting and telephoto apparatus, Antarctica, January 1912”

  1. Okie Bill

    The massive size of the tripod stuns me. Looks like someone modified a surveyors tripod by the looks of the mount.

  2. Le Kim

    Very interesting picture

  3. ∙ мake it ғuиky ∙
    ∙ мake it ғuиky ∙ says:

    ou yess

  4. preppy.g

    amazing classic

  5. surferspics

    must be hard to flick though the menu interface with those animal gloves.

  6. captcapella

    These were the devotees of photography. This was the only way, not an option.
    Talk about patience.

  7. stephaniefarber
    stephaniefarber says:

    how cool 🙂

  8. nuno borges

    Are you sure this is not a primitive machinegun?

  9. infocusI

    Beautiful ! . imagine having that today! You’d have to join a gym to keep in shape just to carry it!

  10. zaphad1

    great photo!
    The device they used as a light meter here its called a watkins bee meter f stops on the left!! f/90 anyone?
    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/25797459@N06/4628372963/] you rotate the front and a sliver of light reactive paper appears< the 2 semicircles open up to reveal white paper

    You needed a stop watch and timed how long it took for the paper to match the 2 sides to be of equal darkness in the small circle at bottom.
    The exposure times are scarily long.
    Its light reactive paper or something. This one still works

  11. PegaPPP

    Gorgeous

  12. bolas

    Seems more like heavy machine gun mounted on a tripod ! 🙂

  13. BoltzmanX

    Chuck Norris invented this camera.

  14. brucethomas

    Now that’s what I call a long lens!!!

  15. Diego Carraro
    Diego Carraro says:

    Is a Nikon!! 🙂

  16. zaphad1

    cannon lol

  17. W10

    Ultra machine gunner at a casual glance…:-)

  18. fenzedinn

    Looks like a Cannon to me!

  19. Surya & Maya

    Wonderful picture! I’m not sure that’s a telephoto lens, however, just a very long normal one.

  20. Sid Brunskill
    Sid Brunskill says:

    Was Flickr even around back then? 🙂

  21. Colin Clarke~
    Colin Clarke~ says:

    Nice !! No battery problems, either.

  22. zaphad1

    Imagine those gloves as a christmas present lol where you try and guess what they are from the wrapping.

  23. Anayaphotography2.0
    Anayaphotography2.0 says:

    Wow Amazing!!!

  24. kudlanka23

    he become my personal hero 😀

  25. BobbyUllmann

    nice gloves

  26. Pierre Éthier
    Pierre Éthier says:

    ♥ kЄЄP it up . .♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    ______♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    _________♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    ___________♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    _____________♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    ______________♥♥♥♥♥♥
    _______________♥♥♥♥
    _______________♥♥♥
    ______________ ♪♫•Superbe capture !

  27. Ryan Hartson-Weddle
    Ryan Hartson-Weddle says:

    What a piece of crap. Probably only has like 2 mega-pickles

  28. Delta The Pig
    Delta The Pig says:

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanetics] I’d say 1 pickle

  29. fenzedinn

    No pickles here but probably some mighty fine grain film. Imagine the work these guys had to go through to get one good image!

  30. dawadderman

    Considering that it is (probably) a whole plate camera – 6.5 x 8.5 ins – and assuming a resonable fine grain is used on the glass plates, I reckon the resolution would exceed any of the prosumer digitals in use today!
    My experience digitising whole print photographs obtained by contact printing from glass plates, is that detail is there down to 1200ppi.

  31. Delta The Pig
    Delta The Pig says:

    Damn then why are so many big plate looky camera pictures from the 1860s look like crap?

  32. pim (pimbert) rdwrt
    pim (pimbert) rdwrt says:

    It’s a matter of price / performance. The majority of people would not be rich enough to buy quality material. Even compared to the 1970s your cheap ass DSLR lens is of much higher precision at a lower cost than could ever be made by back then.

    Also, each single snapshot would be very expensive, even if it ended up looking like crap, you couldn’t afford to throw it away.

    But just look at this picture. Almost 100 year old. Made in crazy cold temperatures. Your DSLR batteries would drain in half an hour. And the quality is amazing. But since we’re talking arctic explorers here, they probably had the money to bring two high quality cameras along. (I mean, who made this picture!)

  33. Delta The Pig
    Delta The Pig says:

    Well thats kind of a give in :p

  34. Arturcampos

    It’s so strange…such an old photo with so much quality 🙂

    Congratulations

  35. Surya & Maya

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/dawadderman]

    there often wasn’t a button – you just removed the lens cap to start the exposure and replace it when you wanted to stop!

  36. Surya & Maya

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/51996567@N08]

    often because they were poorly developed, or poorly scanned, or simply degraded over time.

  37. ~Forever Blue
    ~Forever Blue says:

    Spectacular Photo!
    Thank you for sharing your photo in our Group!

    * We Love the way you CATCH THE MALE PORTRAIT!!

  38. W.....

    At first I really thought he was holding a machine gun. Also those mitts are fun, bear paws.

  39. APu72

    Could you imagine setting this camera up today at New York for street photography? 🙂

  40. Santos Domingo Ortiz
    Santos Domingo Ortiz says:

    Si esta foto es original constituye todo un documento acerca de los equipos fotograficos que se utilizaba en 1912 y más en la antartida. Hoy en días las cámaras actuales por más que sean resistentes a las condiciones atmosfericas en lugares extremos como la antartida requieren de protección como esta cámara.

  41. victuallers2

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Ponting

  42. CKr.

    I want those gloves 😀

  43. zaphad1

    Make sure youre spare film doesnt get too hot and is refridgerated

  44. Yuell Lisondra
    Yuell Lisondra says:

    thats what you call armed and deadly!

  45. andretufenkian
    andretufenkian says:

    vintage

  46. walfrichirinyy
    walfrichirinyy says:

    he visto sientos de camara pero nuca ubiera imajinado gue exsistio una asi estoy asonbradoy eso no me sucede tan facil

  47. FedeGuendel

    I love how it’s called Apparatus

  48. newdasilva@flickr.com
    newdasilva@flickr.com says:

    Old Fashion

  49. Pablo 67

    Dio come lo invidio, ma perchè non sono nato a quei tempi?!

  50. Poganin

    MG 42 😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *